- This topic has 44 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by .
- Topic
Don’t get me wrong, I think there are aspects of owning an EV which could be highly beneficial to disabled people. To be able to drive for 80%+ of the time with only one pedal will make life much easier for those who struggle with lower limb issues.
It is an unfortunate truth, though, that there are limitations too. Far too many chargers are inaccessible for wheelchair users, cables are far too heavy and bulky for those who have issues with their arms and then there’s rolling up 10m of charging cable.
Then there’s the housing caused problems, if you can’t park in one place, on your property, then you are going to struggle getting your car charged. Motability have provided a charge card that discounts a small amount off a public charging company that has poor coverage and a poor reputation, that’s not enough to aid the disabled person , unable to work and afford expensive public charging. With the perception of limited range (helped by the media hype) there’s a perceived requirement to charge until full, which can result in a cost up to £60 for a big battery on an expensive rapid. Not the same as a quick fuel up for £10 or £20 when your budget is greatly limited.
But the APs are favourable. To be honest, they’re huge incentives to go electric and, if you’re considering it, then it’s a great bonus, however, the size of some APs for sizeable ICE or Hybrid vehicles does seem to push all customers towards the BEV solution.
Who are Motability serving? They’ll argue that they’re only passing on the prices that the manufacturers offer (partly true) and that the pressure from Government creates a pressure on the manufacturers to discount EVs.
Should Motability be concerned with aiding research into charging solutions for those with parking near but not in their homes? Should they be working to create an affordable public charging solution, if they’re content with guiding customers towards BEVs? Maybe simply fighting for those unable to charge or operate an EV should be a target including ensuring affords and reliable ICE and Hybrid options until legislation prohibits such cars?
What do you guys think? Let’s keep this reasonable – the usual FUD found elsewhere will be reported and removed.
I'm Autistic, if I say something you find offensive, please let me know, I can guarantee it was unintentional.
I'll try to give my honest opinion but am always open to learning.Mark
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.