Reply To: Here we go again.

#299848
kezo
Participant

    latest one – this one is digging so deep now it trots out the same examples they’ve already used admits the saving to the taxpayer would be NIL if Motability was stopped as PIP would still be paid and explains vaguely that the losses are because of reinvestment in EV – then says ( without quantifying any number) that evs are being handed back in droves. Melanie Reid used to write for that paper – tetraplegic from a horse riding accident- I wonder what her view would be? Motability and the service so poor people are handing back EVs https://www.thetimes.com/article/96ceaa5f-6458-49e1-85cc-4cb363cfaeeb?shareToken=1b722e819d93ea254cbe4392fc760288

    It makes laugh, when The Times (in this case), can write two conficting articles on the same subject!