The CX60 is a cracking car with a quality interior akin to that of BMW in my oppinion. We found the seats didn’t have alot of height ajustment and felt low at full height and no built seat extenders, which caused a lack of thigh support for mrs kezo. The centre comsole is wide but, can’t see it being an issue. Certainlt one to at least go and look at! The best PHEV setup on the scheme, is the Toyota built Suzuki Across but I jnow your not overly keen on having a Suzuki. How about full Hybrid for a wider choice and have decent economy? I have extened my early termination timescale with Mb, to cover this upoming quarter. If nothing comes along I’ll be leaving the scheme and be making do with my private car untill I find something else to px it with.
I don’t like the look of the CX-60 (or any of the Mazda SUVs for that matter) but the appeal of the CX-60 was that it’s X3 size. After today, that might be too high for my wife. I watched a review on it yesterday and they also said that the seats were poor. Next to no lateral support, resulting in moving around whilst cornering. That might be another issue for my wife as she can’t use her legs to steady herself. We looked at the CX-5 when we changed last time and thought that the interior quality was good.
You’re right that I wouldn’t want a Suzuki but we did have a Toyota RAV4 years ago that we kept for 10 years it was so good. I don’t think that they are on the scheme any more, which is odd, although I know that their infotainment systems are woefully off the pace of other brands.