That particular “CPU” is a mobile chip. It’s designed as a mobile APU. It’s an low end Stoney Ridge APU. Stoney Ridge being a notebook skew of APUs, there’s no desktop variant of it. The desktop variant of AMD low end APUs is called A10 and uses the AM4 socket, not the mobile FT4 BGA socket. BGA sockets are soldered.
The Pentium G630 is Sandy Bridge used in desktops and some laptops.
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6 core ZEN 3 (2020/1), mid range gaming processor based on AM4 socket in both desktops and laptops. Stoney Ridge/Bristol Ridge (2015/6) 28nm process and 2 cores, compared to 7nm for ZEN3!
As for the recommendation, i don’t know why you recommend an AM4 over a budget AM5 CPU, considering that there’s zero “future proofing” on an AM4 board. Down to not supporting USB4. A decent budget AM5 board plus 7600 makes much more sense. Heck, even a 5600g or 5600gt would make more sense. And i’m saying that coming from a 3800x (to 9800x3d) – “X” skews increase clocks ever so slightly, while increasing power consumption, temps etc. Makes no sense to me in a non-gaming build.
Why recommend Zen 4 architecture when @DumfriesDick already has a decent computer based on ZEN 3 architecture, which he probably bought prior to to the launch of ZEN 4 and likely see him through, it’s like saying why not go for the latest Zen 5 architecture (your always chasing your tail) and imo opinion it’s not worth jumpin one above, every time something new comes out, we’d be bankrupt! Ontop of that, he would have to buy a new motherboard and graphics card, as is not compatible with PCI5.
“X” processors are also for more demanding multitasking, as well as gaming and the higher clock speed % see a similar % rise in temeperature. Naw whether DD does gaming or demanding tasks, I don’t know, but dare bet he doesn’t tickle it’s capabilties