Suggesting Easee chargers didn’t have load balancing is just BS. Ohme very well know load balancing is a “requitrement” otherwise why supply a clamp in the their charger. Talk about digging a deeper hole for themselves!
Whoever they contracted to come and swop you over to Ohme needs sacking. They took the clamp off realising it was wireless and not compatable with the Ohme charger and either couldn’t be arsed to hard wire one or they didn’t understand the regs surrounding chargers.
On the otherhand if Ohme chargers were built to the same standard as Easee chargers aong with others on the market, there wouldn’t be an issue with connecting a wireless clamp.
What is most worrying is a customer let alone a disabled one, unaware of the risks involved because a qulified installer either couldn’t be arsed or didn’t understand. It also begs the question, how many more Motability installs aren’t to standard!
@MFillingham is another who had an issue very early on during the survey stage with an outrageous maximum demand, that led to the DNO contacting him, because “apparently” he was the one that calculated it, according to the paperwork. Would you or anyone else n here know how to calculate it?
I’d love to write to Motability on behalf everyone but, I’d expect it fall on death ears. However I’ll be having a charger fitted in the not so distant future and beieve me I’ll just be your average punter when they do and won’t think twice reporting it to the IEC/NICEIC if its not fitted to current regs.