We need to remember, this article and the organisation that released it have no cares about the people on the receiving end of what has been said. It is written to appeal to those who look down on the majority of people from their mansions and highlight the point that there are people getting brand new cars every three years just for receiving the correct benefit. It’s a furtherance of the established systematic scrounging that these people believe exists.
The target audience wouldn’t know what to do should they find themselves in the same position as many recipients of PIP, ESA and similar benefits.
it’s a disgusting thing to ge writing, especially after the damage the last article did to Motability’s reputation and offerings.
It’s amazing that there’s a contingent complaining that certain cars are on the scheme and another complaining that the same cars need an advanced payment of so much money.
I'm Autistic, if I say something you find offensive, please let me know, I can guarantee it was unintentional.
I'll try to give my honest opinion but am always open to learning.
Mark