0.1% / 99.90% is a huge difference to 0.1 / 99.99% that was an honest error.
The per 100k or 1m per capita which ever is used is exactly that to make you think the difference is huge like between 50 cases per 100k or 500 cases per 100k the difference is not as big as they trying to makeout. that is my point.. who’s putting out info thats wrong. you have no clue at all.. 10X as many is very misleading also, to one decimal place.
50/100k = 0.0005
500/100k = 0.005
Just like with the R rate it don’t apply to the real world, just as you cannot dig half a hole, you cannot infect half a person or less than a whole person, so if R drops below 1 then there is no infections in reality..
When you don’t have answers you use the same approach over and over and say people should stop lieing when you miss the point totally and it seems do not to want to listen or understand. imo thats your loss.. The data don’t lie 3% max global deaths from over 52m closed cases(that they knew of) and many was with covid not of covid So the likelyhood is the figure is alot lower than 3%. If my own mother was to get covid she would die but not from covid from a pre- existing condition and only in the uk around 339 ppl have died under a certain again and with no pre-existing conditions and i bet you say that’s not true either. even though an mp said it in parlement.