- This topic has 10 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 11 months ago by
.
- Topic
Article
Those of you with long memories will remember Xedos, the ill-fated premium brand launch by Mazda in 1989 and shuttered only seven years later in 1996.
It remains historically significant for one reason – it showed, even as far back as the late ‘80s, Mazda had ambitions to compete in the premium segment, and clearly believed that only the slightly humdrum Mazda brand name, attached to everything from light runabouts to pick-ups, was holding the company back.
Well, if our information on the next-generation 6 is correct, Mazda’s ambitions have not dulled, and the company appears to believe that no rebranding will be necessary to reposition the flagging mid-sizer into a much more upmarket space.
Think: a spacious, rear-wheel drive saloon, powered by an inline six, and ready to go head-to-head with the likes of the entry-level Mercedes-Benz C-Class, BMW 3-series, Audi A4 and Lexus ES.
Best executive cars: our guide
Why the next Mazda 6 could go RWD
The source of this leak was an investor presentation uncovered by Jalopnik, in which the Japanese manufacturer delivered a comprehensive outline of future initiatives that it plans to implement between 2020 and 2025. This included a new ‘Large Architecture,’ with all indicators pointing to it being rear-drive.The presentation also confirms that two inline-six engines are under development; one Skyactiv-D diesel and the other featuring Mazda’s Skyactiv-X Spark Plug Controlled Compression Ignition (SPCCI) technology. Electrification is also part of the plan, as 48-volt mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid systems are mentioned.
There’s further credence to the theory that the first car to featuring the new platform and engines will be the next 6, due in late 2022.
Mazda Kodo: what’s next for its design language
Mazda has recently confirmed that it will continue to evolve its Kodo design language, as displayed on concept cars such as the Mazda Vision Coupe (pictured above) that give an idea of what the next-gen 6 could look like, with the cab-rearward, long-bonnet proportions being suited to packaging an inline six driving the rear wheels.And if you’ve already spotted the sports-car possibilities that could be opened by a new rear-drive platform at Mazda, well done, give yourself a bonus point.
Suddenly, the design language of the RX Vision concept (first shown in 2015) takes on a whole new significance, and even if a production version was built with an inline-six instead of a rotary engine, surely that would still be a car worthy of celebration.
Fact is, Mazda needs the new 6 to reverse the slumping fortunes of the current car. In the USA, for example – by far Mazda’s largest market – the 6 shifted 33,400 units as recently as 2017. In 2019, that figured had dropped to 21,500, and this year the decline seems set to continue. Here in the UK, the 6 lags behind its Insignia, Mondeo, Passat and Superb rivals, while in Australia in 2019, the 6 was down around 13 percent compared to 2018 in the shrinking mid-size class.
Mazda has made no secret of its ambitions to push its models further upmarket, with USA CEO Masahiro Moro confirming to media on several occasions that the company has set its sights on a ‘path to premium,’ while retaining its core philosophy of driver involvement.
Naturally there’s no official confirmation on details on the replacement for the 6, and it’s possible that development could be delayed by disruption from the Covid-19 pandemic, but the signs are compelling.
The only person who got all his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe.
Anything i post over three lines long please assume it is an article lol.
- Replies
I hope the car looks like that when it’s released. It looks amazing. It’s got an Aston Martin Rapide look about it.
It is beautiful DB no doubt about that.
The only person who got all his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe.
Anything i post over three lines long please assume it is an article lol.
The only person who got all his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe.
Anything i post over three lines long please assume it is an article lol.Always liked mazda, was involved in racing an RX7 back in the 80’s.Plus lots of work in tuning and selling them. They are an underrated make in the UK, The Quality of manufacturing and production was as good as any cars then. We still have a MK1 MX5 which is a lovely little car.
It’s very Aston’like isn’t it? Rear and side profile. Not a bad thing.
I have fingers crossed for this one.@DonkeyOatie, I agree, they do make great cars. I owned a Mk1 MX5 as well. A Monaco, which was I believe, the only UK spec to have a factory tan roof.
I absolutely loved it and shed more than one tear when it went.
? I will be remembered for nothing but had great fun doing it ?
Rear-wheel drive from a six-pot engine sound good. And if the car could look at least a bit like the design studies then it sounds like a decent desirable motor. If done in a two-door version then even better. Believe Mazda did a very similar car some 20/30 years back (626 coupe?) which was well-loved by owners and drove well too, albeit through front-wheel drive. Bit like a Capri which didn’t break down!
Always had reservations about their Skyactive engines though; they seem an odd mixture of engineering styles and, on paper, don’t seem to deliver much power for their displacement.
we currently have a mazda 6 tourer 2.0 petrol skyactive but it seems very much short of power the rest of the car is good i particularly like the “i drive”copy for the infotainment/nav almost as good as bmw
"the world is full of kings and queens who blind your eyes and steal your dreams-its heaven and hell "(RJD)
Peugeot 2008gt
Selenium greyI had one of the last Rover 800 Vitesse’s that had a 2.0L petrol engine with 200bhp as standard and I tuned it to 280bhp very easily with lots of headroom to go higher if needed but as standard it did 0-60 in 7.3 (5.6 after tune) and that was rapid for such a big beast of a car.
How do they manage to drag so little from the same displacement?
From what I remember the 2.0 skyactiv engine was built for economy and not performance. Yes the power output does seem low for a 2.0 but I think it has to be that size for the technology to work.
As with a lot of engines now, you can’t really tell what the performance will be like just by looking at the capacity. You usually need to read a bit further to see what it’s all about.
I’ve got no idea how skyactiv works so i couldn’t even begin to explain it but i’m sure it would be interesting to read up on.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.