A tracker don’t tell you who’s actual driving the car, just where it maybe parked overnight for example, if for instance it’s parked at a named drivers house overnight say or 5 miles away from the claimants address on a regular basis. I have heard a few people on here, who said that they had to agree to having a tracker fitted to get their next car. MBO had no issue with when my last brother got married and moved out of my mum’s house as she didn’t drive and also his wife was added as they both worked quite near where our mum lived also. They was also allowed to drive the car to their home adresss outside the m25 when my mum lived in camden. It was however used for my mum and so they could get to her if needed and mb knew about the situation. So i guess it’sone of those situations where if you not upfront and do abuse the scheme as some must do, just as some abuse blue badges. I live 140 miles away and was the only driver of my scheme cars. so i doubt they’d need to fit a tracker to make sure it is being used by the claimant and goe’s to there address regularly.
IMHO, if a car isn’t kept at the claimants address, a tracker should be fitted automatically. That would show if the named user made regular visits to the claimants home address. If they didn’t, it would surely warrant further investigation.
Similarly, if it was used by a named driver to make regular visit to specific addresses, a place of work or the school run for example, could that really be judged as being of benefit to the claimant?
Current car: Mini Countryman EV in very shiny black!
Previous car: MG HS Exclusive in nice shiny black.