I cannot see that being the case, as any car you order is at the price at the time of ordering. Unless the manufacturer changes the spec. Then it usually will have a different code on the system.
I would also guess that those answering the phones don’t know and are not involved in working on the changes. So are as, we are, totally in the dark. Until a decision on the changes is made.
on another note. I saw this posted on FB
Under the Equality Act 2010. Isn’t treating one disabled person less favourably than another based on their general condition considered unlawful direct discrimination?
However, it is lawful to treat a specific person more favourably than others to meet their specific needs.
So one could say charging a tax on the AP based on a person’s condition and not charging others due to their condition is direct discrimination.
When the time comes to implement the added cost to some scheme users over others. Who will a user of the scheme hold accountable for being discriminated against under the act?
Will it be the government or Mobility who are implementing these changes on behalf of or under pressure from the government? Instead of sticking up for disability rights. Motability is supporting these measures. That could well be unlawful.
EX30 SMER Ultra