Rest what case, you never put one, just some random comment regarding the nhs being underfunded what i gave you is the facts to dismiss your lame claim. how much is being lost by the small amount of users abusing the scheme do you know?
The country is in such a mess, because of what? again another random comment with no basis of fact?
Did I ever say I was worried about the nhs being underfunded, no I did not you did!
That’s resting a case and closing it
I have said as have other’s, that the scheme should be not abused but also my view is that not all user’s of the scheme should be treated like they are or may abuse it, because a few are and get away with it?
If some don’t mind a tracker that’s on maybe 24/7 then that is up to them and clearly mb don’t see it that way. Not that it even says it will be in the article, but it seems to be what some are suggesting should be the case.
Did you read the original article if not i suggest you read it? as it does not relate to named drivers, only unnamed drivers policies and those who are in care homes and is from 2nd October 2012 almost 10 years ago.
What i have a problem with is some people trying to force others to adopt a policy they want to see in place because a few misuse the system and the goto answer is we must all be tracked or put under surveillance to stop it. What about our freedoms and rights, by joining the scheme they do not or should not apply?