[jojo22]

Whately and McFadden compete to provide most misleading contributions to king’s speech debate

A Commons debate that followed last week’s king’s speech was littered with misleading statements about disabled people’s

Worth a read if your into keeping abreast of such matters

imo IF for nothing else it gives an insight into the man who calls the shots Pat McFaddens thinking ahead of his decisions following the Timms review due in SEP and a sniff of whats to come

https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/whately-and-mcfadden-compete-to-provide-most-misleading-contributions-to-kings-speech-debate/?fbclid=IwY2xjawR9TVNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeHKqP6LypajpDtSlwefdTseXcHFHv-occpmMq86D4-YttNB8_EN_sQKbzu2U_aem_R9qDXWTi2Le6gcSkfQocMw

 

 

 

 

Topic

[kezo]

I wouldn’t expect any different from both sides and its about time they are held to account!

[MFillingham]

Holding to account should be a standard for the House.  Forget vague claims that can’t be proven one way or another, when claims are made about a statistic the source and statistic should also be provided for Hansard to record.

Imagine the change in statements if they had to provide the source for everyone to pull apart.

I'm Autistic, if I say something you find offensive, please let me know, I can guarantee it was unintentional.
I'll try to give my honest opinion but am always open to learning.

Mark

[Author]

Replies