Election 2019: Johnson backtracks on promised social care plan

This topic contains 3 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  callmejohn 7 months, 1 week ago.

  • Creator
  • #98133 Reply


    Boris Johnson has refused to offer any long-term solution to the social care crisis in his party’s general election manifesto, despite insisting when he became prime minister that he had a “clear plan” for doing so.

    Instead, the party has offered only future discussions with other parties to build a “cross-party consensus” on reform, following years of disagreement among politicians on how to fund the social care system.

    It said this “consensus” would “bring forward an answer that solves the problem, commands the widest possible support, and stands the test of time”.

    Only last month, a Tory cabinet minister admitted there was not even consensus within the government on how to solve the adult social care funding crisis, despite Johnson’s announcement in Downing Street in July.

    Johnson (pictured) had said: “… and so I am announcing now – on the steps of Downing Street – that we will fix the crisis in social care once and for all with a clear plan we have prepared.”

    But instead of a clear plan, the manifesto offers only £1 billion a year extra to fund the system in England, for 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24 (an extra £1 billion for 2020-21 had already been announced).

    The King’s Fund has said that this extra funding “is not enough to meet rising demand for care while maintaining the current quality and accessibility of services”.

    The Tory manifesto also says that any long-term plan will have to ensure that “nobody needing care should be forced to sell their home to pay for it”.

    When asked how the party justified further delays to social care reform; what had happened to Johnson’s “clear plan”; and whether the manifesto was a breach of Johnson’s promise when he became prime minister, the party repeated the policies laid out in the manifesto and said that putting social care on a sustainable footing was crucial.

    The party told DNS that it had outlined a clear three-point plan to resolve the social care issue in the long term.

    The government originally promised that a social care green paper would be published by the end of 2017, and then July last year, before delaying it to the autumn and then the end of 2018.

    After missing the December 2018 deadline, it was delayed until “the earliest opportunity” in 2019, before health and social care secretary Matt Hancock told MPs it would be published by April.

    Hancock then said he could only promise that it was “coming in due course”.

    The green paper has yet to be published.

Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
  • #98139 Reply


    None of the parties have any solutions.

    #98145 Reply


    The NHS has to be our absolute priority. The first thing all parties and citizens have to accept is that it’s going to be an extremely expensive project. The second thing we have to accept is that fixing it is going to be be a very lengthy project. You can’t train thousands of doctors, nurses, clinicians, technicians etc as a short term fix, it’s going to take years. Whichever party is returned to governance on December 12th fixing the health service has to start immediately. Protecting the price of medication especially from the USA pharmaceutical giants would be a critically valuable start.

    This is a major part of the COMMON SENSE party’s manifesto!

    #98192 Reply


    POPS, I do respect your right to vote for your very own commonsense party, although I am absolutely totally bewildered, as to what your very own individual definition of your very own commonsense party is, or to how you are going to cast your vote for it as there is no such party.

    Is this as, you have stated previously, how you may vote or intend to vote in this General Election, for an independent, candidate, if one even exists in your own constituency.

    The bottom line POPS, is do you trust BoJo & Co to protect us the disabled and Social Welfare vulnerable in a Tory run Government who run’s a National Health and Welfare system which by all accounts could be diluted by farming it out to private companies, USA or otherwise, in part or in hole, which BoJo has never fully answered or do you open it up to your locally Independent Elected MP’s (who can never Govern and who maybe do not even exist in your constituency), and cannot be able to protect our National Health System which Labour developed and are the party who will always maintain our National Health System and who we on this forum have all benefited from and we should all very much appreciate and be indebted too.


Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Reply To: Election 2019: Johnson backtracks on promised social care plan

You can use BBCodes to format your content.
Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

Your information: