October 11, 2019 at 12:53 pm #91160
As fwippers said we need a new thread and here it is.
October 13, 2019 at 11:14 pm #91531
I think he knows he won’t.October 13, 2019 at 11:34 pm #91532
My 2c on a second referendum is, it’d be a colossal case of shooting yourself in the foot. The existence of a 2nd referendum would mean that the first referendum didn’t count effectively. If the first one didn’t count, then why would a second one irrespective of the result. Remainers would just moan and demand a 3rd one if they lost for a second time, and Leavers would say “Ok then, well when Leave won, in the end, the referendum didn’t count, so does this mean the 2nd referendum where Remain won also won’t count?”
I know this is replying to a post 3 pages ago but I had a busy few days looking at cars n stuff so only just read it.
I for one, have no problems stating I personally voted to leave and with the way the EU has apparently treated the UK with regards the leave process, I am more resolute in my desire to leave than I was 3 1/2 years ago.October 14, 2019 at 12:41 am #91537
Colin any second referendum, if there is one, would need to be legally binding and not advisory as the last one.
I respect everyone’s right to vote the way they did, but I firmly believe we know much more about leaving than we did three years ago. You only need to look at this thread to see there are leavers with a deal, leavers without a deal, remainers who could live with a deal and remainers who can’t.
The question in any future referendum would be crucial.
At this time the opposition are suggesting they may support a deal delivered by BJ but only if it is put to the general public in an accept this deal or remain in the Eu referendum.
On this thread I am fairly confident this would not be acceptable to Mike 700, wigwam or fwippers, it probably would be acceptable to Pops and myself.
So glad to see you getting involved in the thread and in the mean time hold onto your hat next week is set to be explosive ?.October 14, 2019 at 8:59 am #91566
Yes, we do know a lot more, Brydo. We know the EU is intransigent, incapable of reform and heading towards become a technocratic empire with its own army which will accept no democratic attempt to prevent it.October 14, 2019 at 9:04 am #91568
A lot of people say we know a lot more now (almost exclusively remainer’s). All we know is we have over 500 MP’s who were firmly opposed to leaving and have done all they can to try and thwart the leaving process together with a section of the media and civil service. As pointed out if the vote 3 years ago had been 52/48 remain what concessions would the leavers have got? None. We would have continued as before but the “losing” 48% feel that because it was a “close” vote there should be concessions. I’m in favour of a sensible deal but “remain” needs to accept it lost the argument and the referendum. Any 2nd referendum will be toxic and probably undemocratic.October 14, 2019 at 9:48 am #91574
The reality of this shambles is that there is no consensus in the House of Commons for any deal. The ERG, BJ and his cronies, labour ( what ever that is now), the SNP (Indy ref 2 a requirement), Lib Dem’s (trying to take up ground no other party recognises) and the DUP.
How can any deal be done when every party has its own agenda?
PUT IT BACK TO THE PEOPLE, YOU KNOW ITS THE ONLY SOLUTION.October 14, 2019 at 9:52 am #91575
Because the main political parties said they would carry out the will of the people as decided in the referendum. Having another referendum let’s the politicians get away with it. Didn’t Barnier do well?October 14, 2019 at 9:57 am #91577
Discussions continue at pace to agree a deal that is already agreed. Yes Mrs May’s deal was already agreed but BJ needs to make it look that he has thrashed out a new improved snatched victory from the jaws of defeat deal. In reality it is Mrs May’s deal in all but name.
There could be many, those with BJ right wing blinkers on, who will herald this deal as a break through but I see it as the deal that has been on the table for months.October 14, 2019 at 10:01 am #91578
If that turns out to be the case, he’s out of a job and the Conservative Party is finished.October 14, 2019 at 10:12 am #91579
Wigwam it’s because the “will of the people” is not clear enough that we are in this mess. The Brexit or remain question was to broad in reality to be a proper question. Team aim is clear no doubt but leaving the Eu that’s an entirely different question.
Brexit means different things to different people.
Take this thread as an example wigwam you want a hard Brexit, I thought fwippers was in the same boat but he says he would be happy with a “sensible deal” not sure what that is. Mike 700 would have accepted Mrs May’s deal.
So here we have three Brexiteers all with different views of what Brexit means.
How on earth was the result of the first referendum clear?October 14, 2019 at 10:43 am #91581
In brief, Brydo, there has never been any “deal” offered by the EU that allows us to leave. If any was, then I’d be leaping for joy.October 14, 2019 at 10:47 am #91582
Another sham going on today “the queens speech” is another con job by BJ.
No majority, no chance of getting the speech approved, just another party political ploy by BJ in the run up to another general election.
The Queen has been used by this cad twice, has he no shame?October 14, 2019 at 11:19 am #91585
Barnier is playing on the weakness of Parliament caused by all those MPs elected on the basis of supporting leaving who have now reneged. The only way out is a not another divisive referendum but a GE so we can hold our MPs to account and hopefully alter the landscape so we can negotiate meaningfully from a position of strength.October 14, 2019 at 11:19 am #91586
You don’t rate Johnson, do you Brydo.October 14, 2019 at 11:24 am #91587
Isn’t the State Opening if Parliament just an all expenses paid shindig for the elite? The speech could be put on YouTube.October 14, 2019 at 12:55 pm #91591
The problem with a GE is that it is unlikely to change the numbers in parliament. It will change a number of faces with the Tories shedding MPs we would automatically recognise.
At this moment in time we have only one topic to discuss and that is what a general election would be a vote on Brexit. However there is much more to running a country than sorting out Brexit.
BJ has surrounded himself with the most right wing government, probably, ever. These are the people who would run the country for the next four years not just deal with Brexit.
That is frightening.October 14, 2019 at 1:10 pm #91593
Only if you believe the New Statesman and its ilk, Brydo. By nature Johnson is socially liberal.October 14, 2019 at 1:11 pm #91594
The only thing all of this posturing by MP’s has demonstrated is their arrogance and their contempt for democracy. It’s like we are living in 1819 or 1919 not 2019. We know the EU is undemocratic too. As a side story the operators of the sandbanks ferry could have sourced a replacement ferry but although it met German safety standards it did no comply with UK ones. Strange we have lots of different rules and regulations when the EU harps on about alignment and the single market.October 14, 2019 at 1:23 pm #91596
BJ is not anything of substance by nature wigwam he is a chameleon. If the stories are to believed
I do believe people can change their minds but to go from one extreme to the other is a bit of a concern.October 14, 2019 at 1:32 pm #91597
Another sham going on today “the queens speech” is another con job by BJ. No majority, no chance of getting the speech approved, just another party political ploy by BJ in the run up to another general election. The Queen has been used by this cad twice, has he no shame?
I know this is contentious and I don’t want to stoke the flames any further, but I have to agree with Brydo’s post.
The Queen has been used shamelessly by Boris Johnson to deliver a high profile “conservative election manifesto” speech. She has no option but to deliver a “Queen’s speech” and has had to read out a list of undeliverable promises made by a government with no majority to implement this wish list.
Johnson and Cummings clearly have no respect for the tradition of monarchy.October 14, 2019 at 1:38 pm #91598
The problem is the opposition parties have declined a GE or no confidence vote so by implication support BJ and his governmentOctober 14, 2019 at 2:08 pm #91601
If Johnson was an honourable man he would have got his wish for a general election. The reason why he is being made to wait until after October 31st is precisely because he can’t be trusted. He is a known liar and cheat who has proven that ‘truth’ is not a word that he either values or honours.
In the interests of fair play I should add that very few MP’s will come out of this Brexit debacle with credit. Many are as culpable as Johnson.October 14, 2019 at 2:21 pm #91603
Surely POPS, he was voted in by the Conservative membership to deliver Brexit. MPs who don’t want Brexit know that a GE would give him the numbers to deliver it. Trust doesn’t come into it at this point. Although it may do soon…October 14, 2019 at 2:57 pm #91606
Let’s get rid of party politics.
Why don’t we set up a new ‘imp’s’ party. ‘Independent members of parliament in small letters’ denoting no ego, and a desire to manage the UK’s affairs on a professional, fair and equitable basis.
Government departments to be headed by top professionals in their particular ares of expertise, with oversight from Independent mp’s who are there to represent the interests of both the UK in total and their own individual constituents.
A utopian view of how governance could work if we take the POLITICS out of it.October 14, 2019 at 3:10 pm #91608
I can’t concentrate on politics just now guys
The topic ‘Could Prime Minister Boris Johnson break up the UK? Mark 2’ is closed to new replies.